In honoring those who have suffered for a decade because of the Iraq War.
Summarization of rationalization that took us to war with Iraq. And how the very process of reviewing history led me to the real reason for the Iraqi War.
But do you remember the time before and the events that set us on a collision course with Shock and Awe and a decade of death and loss of treasure?
Sort of? Yes, and all of the details? Ah, not so much?
I thought I knew. But when I took a look back I found myself embarrassed. It was pathetically easy for lies to lead us to war. Funny thing is, I knew they were lies. But even I who has been a “Conspiracy Nut” for 50 years thought there must be SOMETHING critical behind the Leaders rushing to war. From the Presidential group to the Congress someone MUST know something I did not know, because it was a State Secret.
And when the months moved into years, and no weapons of massive destruction were found, I found myself hoping SOMETHING would be found. Something that could justify the pillaging of American lives and money and murder of Iraqi civilians.
I got though those ten years like many other Americans. I honored the troops, did not think about the Iraqi civilians, and said, “Well, what can I do?” And the answer came to me in the form of the Internet. I could learn what the heck was really going on, with others also searching for answers.
Then Rachael Maddow had a special called Hubris: Selling the Iraq War
that aired on MSNBC last month. After watching her pick apart the lies and deceit that led us to war, I researched the details. Not because I doubted her analysis, but in a desperate attempt to figure out how those lies had worked.
Let us take a look back at those lies.
Lie number 1: They made a connection to 9/11 and Iraq based upon a supposed meeting between hijacker pilot Mohamed Atta and the Iraqi Consulate in Prague who was claimed to be an Iraqi intelligence agent. This claim came from a source that was considered untrustworthy. All other evidence indicated that Hussein was actually fearful of Al-Qaeda.
Lie number 2: They claimed Iraq had purchased aluminum tubing for use in creating nuclear weapons - but that charge was completely proven false as the aluminum tubes were simply too thick to be used in developing an uranium centrifuge.
Lie number 3: In spite of documents showing Iraq was buying uranium ore from Niger were proven forgeries, Bush used the State of the Union Address to tell the world that Hussein was buying this yellow brick to pursue plans for nuclear weapons.
Lie number 4: Hussein already had since the late 1990's several mobile biological weapons labs. But this information came from an Iraqi emigrant living in Germany who was known as being so unreliable his codename was Curveball.
Now those are the primary lies. But just as arrogant was the fact that, in spite of the UN refusing to sanction a preemptive war, the U.S. was joined by the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland to physically invade Iraq. WHY?
Why did the U.S. Congress vote in the Iraq War Resolution in October 2002? There were the four lies. Added to that was Hussein’s brutality against his own people - which in my opinion was none of our business. Oh but we had friends in the area who were threatened by attacks from Hussein - he was no fool and he had the crap kicked out of him after he attacked Kuwait in 1990. And Hussein had continued jerking around the U.N. Weapon Inspectors. 133 no votes in the House and 23 no votes in the Senate. Everyone else voted to attack a people that had done nothing what so ever to us.
And then I found something astounding. Congress had already agreed that Hussein needed to be overthrown and had given $97 million to organizations that were in opposition to Hussein. It was way back in October 1998 when Bill Clinton was still President. It was called the Iraq Liberation Act and its stated goal was to support a transition to democracy in Iraq. WHAT?
You remember anything about this? No? Me neither. But remember this was before September 11, 2001 when our reality got shaken to the core.
And you know why they passed that act? They were led to believe Hussein had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons along with some Scud-type missiles and the capacity to produce many more weapons. Hussein had jerked around the UN inspectors and had failed to comply with agreed to obligations following the Gulf War when Kuwait was invaded. Does the fear sound familiar?
But Bill Clinton (not having the 9/11 excuse) came up with a real kicker. He basically challenged Congress to stand up to the bully Saddam. Clinton said that if we did not stop him now Hussein would think the International Community had lost its will. Clinton promised that Hussein would continue to build a huge arsenal of weapon capability and said he guaranteed Hussein would use the arsenal. There were only 38 people in Congress who voted against this Act.
But in fairness to Congress, they were willing to commit to a plan to take down Hussein by supporting others, but they clearly stated in the act that it was NOT authorizing the use of U.S. Military forces. When Bush got into the argument for war, he and others continually cited the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act as reason for a preemptive war. Hussein had, after all, been warned but continued to do bad things. Ah those bad things? The four lies. Five months later we had Shock and Awe.
So what were the REAL reasons for attacking and occupying Iraq for 10 years? I could make an excellent case for control of oil. Or that it was a great economic boom for some companies. War makes corporations tons of money. Nobody wins a war except corporations. Every war has proven this. So a war against Iraq was good business.
My personal favorite was that George Bush was on a Christian Crusade. There are extremists in all religions, including Christianity. Some Christians want to see Jesus return and supposedly that will not happen until there is a major confrontation throughout the Middle East to bring on Armageddon. Bush, the Evangelist, thought he was hurrying it all along by going to war with Iraq.
Bush even tried to convince the French President Chirac to join him on his crusade against Iraq by citing Bible verses. Bush wove some story about how Gog and Magog of Biblical fame needed to be defeated before some New Age began and the Iraq War was willed by God. It confused the French so bad they contacted a professor at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland for clarity. Even the professor was confused.
“Expolitics” refers to policy derived from governments reacting to knowing about ET involvement in Earth. This policy is always clandestine. This paper analyses Iraq policy within the concept of it being dictated by expolitics. If you watch Ancient Aliens, the paper points to the same facts used to prove beings from another planet came to Earth and were here for a very long time.
And while reading the paper I came upon the name William Henry and was absolutely thrilled. I have been a fan of Henry who does radio interviews on Unknown Country. Henry has concluded that a technological device which was brought to Earth during Sumerian times was located in the desert of Southern Iraq.
As the Expolitics article states:
There is however some important circumstantial evidence which lends plausibility to the Henry thesis of a Stargate as the true focus of the Bush administration or at least key interest groups behind it. The first piece of circumstantial evidence, are the overwhelming whistleblower testimonies confirming the existence of clandestine government organizations responsible for suppressing public knowledge of an ET presence, and which controls all official interaction with ET races. (40) From an exopolitical perspective, then, the clandestine suppression of a contemporary ET presence, supports the conclusion that there is also an active clandestine suppression of an ancient ET presence which also has significant public policy implications.
And later in the paper:
The third piece of circumstantial evidence is the resumption of excavations of the first capital of Sumer, Uruk, by a German archeological team in 2002. Given the prominence of Uruk and its likelihood as the site for a Sumerian Stargate, then resumption of excavations raises questions over why they were resumed at this time and what is being sought. Given that political tensions in Iraq had not significantly diminished in 2002 with it being a likely source of future military conflict with the US, it can be suggested that there are powerful hidden motivations for what on the surface appears to be a purely scientific dig of an ancient Sumerian capital.
Now this concept of going to war with Iraq to prevent Iraq and German forces from acquiring a futuristic device from our ancient past is truly stunning. But if it did happen, it may about to happen again in Iran.
Most history will suggest the 1953 takeover was a direct consequence of the Iranian governments nationalization of oil operations of a British oil company now called BP.
However, that happened in 1951 and the U.S. actually benefitted from this nationalization. There was nothing of strategic interest to the U.S. in changing the democratic government.
The oil nationalization was a direct results of the British refusing to play fair with the democratic government of Iran. The Parliament and Prime Minister had attempted getting the Brits to open the books on the oil revenues to make sure Iran was getting the share promised them and BP said no. So the Iranians said, okay fine then we will simple renegotiate the terms to more favorable concessionaire arrangements. When the Brits refused to renegotiate the Iranians nationalized the oil assets.
Nothing really happened until 1953, under the Eisenhower Administration, where John Foster Dulles was the Secretary of State and his younger brother Allen was head of the CIA . And that family is very, very dirty. How dirty we have yet to uncover. But we do know they hung out with some of the very people who originally set up Black Operations. Was is really an overthrow of a democratic nation in the name of oil? Or was it to gain control or Iran to find some treasure?
Since the 1979 overthrow of the Shah it has become increasingly impossible to search for anything within Iran. Now it is impossible. The only way in would be to take the same path taken in Iraq.
There is no mistaking the war posturing going on in Washington. Reports exist of attempts to stage “false-flags” to create a confrontation significant enough to attack Iran. Is ancient Alien technology the real reason for a U.S. bent on occupying nations in the Middle East? It makes much more sense than the lies given about Iraq and the apparent refusal for a sane and open diplomatic policy toward Iran. Oh, and yes try Goggling and you can research those sites talking about Iranian stargates.
There is much more to research in this subject. The point of this post is to honor those who have paid for whatever reason Shock and Awe was required. My way of honoring them was to find out the truth. That search has led to the crazy side of reality with Black Operations running things.
Keep your eyes open.
REFERENCES (partial list)
It means we have another two days to turn on the faucet and let enlightenment pour out on to the planet. Let us realize Bill has opened another opportunity for us to unite in ushering in the age where our Republic will once again flourish. One man struggled to understand the fiction of the courts, had the intellect to actually "get it" and the courage to stand up alone and tell the truth...all the while having the threat of incarceration upon him. For one I am honored to be in his group. The most powerful weapon Bill has and we have is our own minds that we must dedicate to bring in the light. To you all who are following Bill and supporting him, I bow and say Namaste!
CONTINUE THE FIGHT! Commit yourself to BEING the Light Warrior. Let every thought be one of kindness and send love and enlightenment through you heart. For the next 48 hours, you do not have to do anything except BRING IN THE LOVE.
To see Bill’s defense: http://word.office.live.com/wv/WordView.aspx?FBsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fdownload%2Ffile_preview.php%3Fid%3D168458209978559%26time%3D1364313955%26metadata&access_token=100002092165079%3AAVI5i70mJ8VcN675-gwkLle0ltTjxJAqE8eiW6mzq2ECoQ&title=OPPOSITION_%26_RESPONSE_-_brockbrader.doc
To go to his Face Book page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/320738794639382/permalink/510374682342458/?comment_id=510387815674478&offset=0&total_comments=31¬if_t=group_activity